[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tgf] Draft deliverable 1 - the TGF Core Framework
Great
work Peter. My
only <100% positive comment is that we will need to watch the demarcation
between setting the scene/context and the actual framework. As
it stands it flows well, but that point in the text at which you say to
yourself…. ..
"Ah ha..you've set the scene for me. Now here's the framework"… …is
kind of muddy/murky. I
think that may mean that some of the things back might come forward into the
context part, so you get a more complete sense of the 'problem statement', that
the framework then methodically works through to address. Cheers Colin
From: Peter F Brown
[mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] Hi: In line with the proposals that I made last
week, I have submitted to our document repository a first, very rough and ready
draft of what would be the first main standards-track deliverable, the
‘TGF Core Framework’: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tgf/document.php?document_id=40965 I’ve screen scraped from the CS
Transform contributions and used various bits that have also been worked on.
The detail isn’t important at this stage (and as editors, Chris and I
will obviously take care to endure the text is fully coherent), just the
overall structure and flow. I’ll do the same for the next three
– which should be easier as they are more or less straight lifts from the
business management, customer management and channel management sections of the
contributions we have. I’ll submit them asap. As for the four ‘non-standards
track’ Committee Notes, -
we don’t yet have any
substantive content for the one on SOA; -
the one on “tools and
models for the business management framework” will include material we
have on the milestones matrix, the stakeholders map, and the policy map -
the ones on “tools and
models for the customer management framework” and “tools and models
for the channel management framework” are fairly bare at the moment
– we will have to judge how much goes in the respective
‘frameworks’ and how much needs to be left to a non-standards track
paper Regards, Peter Peter F Brown Independent
Consultant Transforming
our Relationships with Information Technologies Blog
pensivepeter.wordpress.com LinkedIn
www.linkedin.com/in/pensivepeter Twitter
@pensivepeter P.O.
Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA Tel: +1.310.694.2278 CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you. ==== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]