OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tgf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Update: Working Draft 01 of the TGF Primer - Comments and Issues


All:

One small clarification/correction, for purposes of ‘good housekeeping’: the Working Draft 01 was created from a draft received from Chris on 18 Feb, and not the version of 13 Feb as mentioned in my mail below. In other words, my starting point was the update that Chris had made following our 17 Feb TC meeting and thus already took into account the discussions of that meeting.

 

What may not be fully captured yet in the Issues List, are all issues that TC members have raised to date in advance of the formal draft being released: I will be going back through notes and posts to validate this and update the Issues List as necessary but please check the List and send me any comments offline if you feel something has been overlooked.

 

Regards,

Peter

 

From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 February, 2011 03:41
To: TGF TC List
Subject: [tgf] Working Draft 01 of the TGF Primer - Comments and Issues
Importance: High

 

All:

The first formal working draft of the TGF Primer has been finalised and loaded to the TC work area. You will have received an automated notification from OASIS.

 

This Working Draft 01 was created after three ‘passes’ from the informal editors’ draft of 18 February:

-          1st pass moved the entire original content into the OASIS official template;

-          2nd pass:

o   integrated comments and edits from Andy regarding the Critical Success Factors (and aligned the Guiding Principles in consequence);

o   I transposed Components 3 and 2, so that the running order is now Guiding Principles, CSF’s, Delivery Processes and Benefits Realisation;

o   A Disclaimer is added at the beginning to clarify that much potential standards material appears in this draft, including draft conformance clauses (which will be moved to the ‘full’ standard deliverable as soon as we start work on that – this can obviously be dropped when the document is finalised;

o   Complete editorial check for language, house style, formatting and consistent use of key terms.

-          3rd pass added my further content as promised:

o   First cut of Technology Management Framework summary and diagram, including introduction to basic SOA concepts;

o   Section on terminology and reference model;

o   First draft list of key terminology for use in the Primer (not the complete terminology that would appear with the standard);

 

The draft is now officially open for comment!

 

Procedure for comments

This may look a little bureaucratic, but I’ve seen TC’s where there are hundreds of issues opened against working drafts, so a little planning will keep us out of trouble…

 

Comments should only be made against the PDF version of a formal draft even when other formats are available: line numbers may change in any .doc or .odf version of a text (because of layout/formatting differences – hence, the use of the PDF version only) and will change from one draft to the next.

 

To make a comment, send a new e-mail message to the TGF list, with the subject line: “New Issue – ” followed by a short issue title.

In the body of the message indicate:

Either that your issue is a general comment; or

the first line number in the PDF text that the issue is concerned with,

then give a succinct paragraph explaining your issue, and indicate (optionally) what you suggest changing or doing differently.

 

The editors will be reviewing all comments regularly and keeping track in the Issues List available in the work area. For minor, uncontroversial changes, an editor may simply reply that the issue taken on board and is resolved; otherwise, the editor will reply (with subject line amended, to remove the ‘New Issue’ prefix), an Issue number will be posted and the TC invited to comment further on the list in reply.

Please try to resist the urge to reply immediately to a new issue, to allow the editors to do their initial work! ;-)

 

The editors will close the issues list before each TC meeting and present a summary of the main issues, resolutions and items that require further consideration by the TC. When the TC decides to ask the editors to create a new iteration of a draft, the process will be repeated.

 

All the best,

Peter

 

Peter F Brown

Independent Consultant

Description: Description: Description: cid:image002.png@01CB9639.DBFD6470

Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies

Web         www.peterfbrown.com

Blog          pensivepeter.wordpress.com

LinkedIn  www.linkedin.com/in/pensivepeter

Twitter     @pensivepeter

P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA

Tel: +1.310.694.2278

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]