[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 9 - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model "Safe Harbour" - open
Nig: I agree that the term needs to change but I’m not convinced that “assured intermediation” is the answer: if individuals themselves manage transactions (as you suggest they should be able to) then there is no intermediation. What is the main concern here? That it is trusted? Interoperable? Pick ‘n’ mix availability? If we can be clearer what is understood here, the right term should emerge… Peter From: Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] Line 737. Chris, Bill and I discussed the ‘Safe Harbour’ concept in the diagram some time ago. I felt uncomfortable about the term during the initial review of the model. Whilst we didn’t finally agree on a term, we were reasonably happy with the term ‘Assured Intermediation’. This allows government, or (more desirably?) intermediaries or individuals themselves (with underlying technical support) to manage transactions. Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]