[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Issue 10 - Conceptual - Focus of Responsibility/Accountability - open
Hi Peter, I
happy with your rewording of line 680. I agree that the bullet starting at line 690 is about broader
sponsorship. However, whilst reading through, it was at this point that I
thought about some of the issues of depth of buy in. It is relatively easy for
any organisation to adopt an approach but far harder to get practitioners
throughout it to actually apply the espoused practices. I think that this is
something that the TGF outputs need to address and the version of the onion diagram
that you had provided earlier seemed to me to play into this space. Perhaps this isn’t the right place (in the document) to
raise this concern. I’m certainly happy to talk further about this. If
you feel it appropriate, we could discuss a little during the call later this
week. I can make the line available a little before or after the time set aside
for that call for an offline discussion or we can start the ball rolling
via email – whichever you prefer. Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell,
Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637
Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147
Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited,
Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U
3BW This e-mail is only for the use of
its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and
may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not
been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. From: Peter F Brown
[mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] Nig: I think there are two issues here: the need for a clearly
defined and explicit functional role of responsibility for the Program; and the
need for that function to be occupied by someone senior enough to pull weight
and supported by sufficient resources (human, operational, etc) to make it
work. I read line 690ff as covering the broader “sponsorship” level
of the Program. For line 680 I’d propose: “A clear focus of accountability: at both the political
and administrative levels there should be an explicit functional responsibility
for the Transformational Program. These functions should be occupied by
individuals with sufficient authority to command the resources and mobilise the
support necessary to fulfil this mission.” On the diagram, I’d like to have a few exchanges offline
with you Nig, so that we can come back to the TC with some further work Peter From:
Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] Line 680. I suggest
that this description should have added to it “..supported by empowered
responsible individuals and or structures in all participating government
organisations I realise that this point
is somewhat reflected in the later point at line 690 but fell that needs to
focus on the actual application of the TGF in projects. Following on to the
outstanding point on diagrams in this section (Highlighted at line 698), I feel
that a version of peter’s “Onion” model fits at this latter
point. I enclose a copy of
it here for easy references.
<<Stakeholder Onion
Model.pdf>> Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056,
Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its
contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu
Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and
amended or that it is virus-free. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]