[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tgf] Issue 9 - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model "Safe Harbour" - open
It does it for me too Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell,
Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637
Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal:
7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited,
Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U
3BW This e-mail is only for the use of
its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and
may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not
been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. From: Peter F Brown
[mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] Chris, I like that, I think that works Peter From: Chris
Parker [mailto:chris.parker@cstransform.com] Peter, Nig The term “safe harbour” was used
to suggest that the different players involved in the franchise marketplace can
be seen by citizens as business as providing trusted and interoperable content
and services (whereas intermediaries “outside” the business model might still
repackage government content, but not within the same “assured” way). So to avoid confusion between
this and other uses of the safe harbour phrase in different contexts, I suggest
we relabel this part of the business model diagram with a simple description:
“Trusted and interoperable content and services”. Chris Parker Managing Partner, CS
Transform Ltd, +44 7951 754 060 From: Peter F
Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] Nig: I agree that the term needs
to change but I’m not convinced that “assured intermediation” is the answer: if
individuals themselves manage transactions (as you suggest they should be able
to) then there is no intermediation. What is the main concern
here? That it is trusted? Interoperable? Pick ‘n’ mix availability? If we can be clearer what is
understood here, the right term should emerge… Peter From:
Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] Line 737. Chris, Bill
and I discussed the ‘Safe Harbour’ concept in the diagram some time ago. I felt
uncomfortable about the term during the initial review of the model. Whilst we
didn’t finally agree on a term, we were reasonably happy with the term ‘Assured
Intermediation’. This allows government, or (more desirably?) intermediaries or
individuals themselves (with underlying technical support) to manage
transactions. Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056,
Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its
contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu
Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and
amended or that it is virus-free. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]