OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tgf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Issue 11 - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model "Safe Harbour" - closed


Title: New Issue - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model

Note: issue number should be 11, not 9 – legacy problem merging two lists! ;-)

 

I’m considering this as closed now, as Chris has addressed the main concern raised originally and seeing no other comment saying otherwise.

 

Peter

 

From: Chris Parker [mailto:chris.parker@cstransform.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 02 March, 2011 09:08
To: peter@peterfbrown.com; 'Greenaway Nigel'
Cc: 'TGF TC List '
Subject: RE: [tgf] Issue 9 - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model "Safe Harbour" - open

 

Peter, Nig

 

The term “safe harbour” was used to suggest that the different players involved in the franchise marketplace can be seen by citizens as business as providing trusted and interoperable content and services (whereas intermediaries “outside” the business model might still repackage government content, but not within the same “assured” way).

 

So to avoid confusion between this and other uses of the safe harbour phrase in different contexts, I suggest we relabel this part of the business model diagram with a simple description: “Trusted and interoperable content and services”. 

 

Chris Parker

Managing Partner, CS Transform Ltd, +44 7951 754 060

From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com]
Sent: 28 February 2011 21:20
To: 'Greenaway Nigel'
Cc: 'TGF TC List '
Subject: [tgf] Issue 9 - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model "Safe Harbour" - open

 

Nig:

I agree that the term needs to change but I’m not convinced that “assured intermediation” is the answer: if individuals themselves manage transactions (as you suggest they should be able to) then there is no intermediation.

What is the main concern here? That it is trusted? Interoperable? Pick ‘n’ mix availability?

If we can be clearer what is understood here, the right term should emerge…

 

Peter

 

From: Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, 28 February, 2011 04:25
To: TGF TC List
Subject: [tgf] New Issue - Conceptual - Franchise Marketplace Model

 

Line 737. Chris, Bill and I discussed the ‘Safe Harbour’ concept in the diagram some time ago. I felt uncomfortable about the term during the initial review of the model. Whilst we didn’t finally agree on a term, we were reasonably happy with the term ‘Assured Intermediation’. This allows government, or (more desirably?) intermediaries or individuals themselves (with underlying technical support) to manage transactions.

 

Regards

Nig

Nig Greenaway

Government Division

FUJITSU SERVICES

Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN

Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637

Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147

E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com
Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com

Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW

This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]