RE: [tgf] Issue 42 - wording on cross-border authentication inCollaborat

Cheers for that

From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com]
Sent: Thursday, 10 March 2011 1:33 p.m.
To: 'TGF TC List'
Subject: [tgf] Issue 42 - wording on cross-border authentication in Collaborative Stakeholder Model - closed

Colin:

Regarding the re-wording on cross-border authentication, I like your rewording better. I’ll take that!

I’ll reply separately on the other issue regarding the diagram, you raise a fair point

Peter

From: Colin Wallis [mailto:Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, 08 March, 2011 14:28
To: 'TGF TC List'
Subject: RE: [tgf] RE: Issue 13 (General)- Technology Management Framework - need to include Core Standards Set? - open

I'm OK with the words (in fact the concept is really really good) except:

"For example, a business wishing to establish itself in a second country may need to provide credentials and government-authenticated information that is managed by a government agency in the first country."

To be consistent, and allowing for the emerging trend towards using private (business)sector credentials we need to generalize this to something like…

"For example, a business wishing to establish itself in a second country may need to provide authenticated information and credentials that is managed by government or business in the first country."

I'm struggling with the diagram personally. I get the relationship between the two circles, but I get lost in the sub circles within the main left hand one…

It could be only me, so if everyone else gets it, that fine. If I am not alone, that may suggest a sentence in the text that explains those right after " In the figure below, we see that collaboration between TGF programs is favoured at the political, legal and organisational levels and only later, if and when necessary, at the more ‘tightly-coupled’ semantic and technical levels".

Cheers

Colin

<<Snip>>

tgf message