RE: [tgf] POLICY PRODUCTS DOCUMENT

John

I think the approach and structure look right. I’m a little stretched at the moment, but will be happy to help fill in gaps etc on your next cut.

One thought that struck me in looking through your paper is that our names for some of the Policy Products have been overtaken – in the sense that terms which we used in the original CS Transform white paper have changed in their TGF incarnation (eg “Governance Model” in the business/political cell has now morphed into the leadership and stakeholder patterns of the TGF).

So as you work on the next version, it would be worth reviewing all the patterns, and making sure that every pattern which explicitly or implicitly requires the production of a written document is captured within the matrix – we need to make sure that our minimum set of policy products at least captures all the things we say are mandatory parts of the TGF!

Thanks,

Chris Parker

Managing Partner, CS Transform Ltd, +44 7951 754 060

From: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tgf@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of John Borras
Sent: 22 November 2011 16:29
To: 'TGF TC List'
Subject: [tgf] POLICY PRODUCTS DOCUMENT

Attached is where I have got to so far with the draft Committee Note on the Policy Products. I’d appreciate an early view of whether this is along the right lines or not to save me wasting any more time if it’s wrong. Specifically:

1. Is it the correct format or do you have an alternative idea on how to construct the CN?

2. Do you have ideas on any other Products that should be added to the list? So far I’ve leaned heavily on what Chris and I produced some time ago for CS Transform but accept that may not be the complete list.

3. Quoting URLs for examples is always dangerous as they are probably not persistent. Should we use them or just the title of the document and let readers find the latest version using their search engines?

4. Is there anything else we need to say in this document about Policy Products in general and/or their usage in a TG program?

If everyone is content with this approach I’ll complete the tables with descriptions and more examples and register this as new Committee Note Draft with TC Admin.

All contributions/views welcomed.

John

tgf message