OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tgf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [tgf] Consulting Engagement



Yes I factored in the ODCA materials as well, among a number of best practices (see CloudRFP.info reference list)

They have similar materials to what many others have, which is a simple list of 'RFP questions you might ask'. This is helpful but for production purposes the more difficult part is the assessment criteria, so that you can score vendor responses. 

This is what I've been working on and these can be informed by the various groups in relevant best practice areas, like KMIP for Key Management, etc.

Cheers, Neil.


On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> wrote:
The ODCA has been doing this. Have a look at
http://www.opendatacenteralliance.org/ourwork/proposalengineassistant?option=com_rfptool&task=step1&Itemid=299&solution_type=ENTERPRISE

/c

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Neil McEvoy
<neil.mcevoy@ifossfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Right. When I was creating the Cloud RFP service, I learned about all the
> different aspects of Encryption : Disk, VM, database, on-site, ... etc.
>
> The common message from all the experts in each area was that 'Key
> Management' is the most important part, for security & compliance, but
> without repeating it in each different area...
>
> Et voila: OASIS KMIP, which provides a standards solution for this unified
> approach.
>
> Therefore some template RFP material that helped guide buyers this way would
> be very useful to the procurement process, and I know that despite NIST et
> al, no one is covering this ground yet - So great membership pull for
> OASIS..
>
> Neil.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Laurent M Liscia
> <laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org> wrote:
>>
>> That's a great idea, Neil.
>> Generally speaking, I don't see why we wouldn't be able to reach out to a
>> variety of eurozone govs and ask them for input (and participation) so that
>> said templates might be developed.
>>
>> --
>> Laurent Liscia, CEO
>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
>> (510) 669-1261
>>
>> Follow OASIS on:
>> LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
>>
>> Take a tour of OASIS at:
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/home/tour.php
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/1/2012 5:31 AM, Neil McEvoy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi John
>>
>> I agree, and actually this service here is based on my engagement with the
>> Province of Ontario: http://CloudRFP.info
>>
>> So there are the first pioneers in government now recognizing the move to
>> Cloud and are preparing for it, including engaging consulting as I
>> demonstrate. This template can now be used by other Ontario agencies for
>> their RFP procurements as well, and so will underpin more work for
>> additional consultants as well as myself.
>>
>> I also agree that OASIS would need to cultivate more in-depth resources
>> for further engagement, which is where our TC efforts can feed in.
>>
>> For example I'd recommend a set of RFP templates from each group (eg Key
>> Management from KMIP) and that PACR co-ordinates these in to one overall set
>> as per the groups agenda.
>>
>> Cheers, Neil.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:04 AM, John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> IMO the challenge is not about trying to convince the consultancy houses
>>> that they need to be conformant with OASIS, or any other open, standards, we
>>> should be looking to get the government agencies to embrace the standards
>>> and then demand conformance to them in their procurement of consultancy and
>>> other ICT services.  So I think we need to target the public sector bodies
>>> and get them on board. But as we all know that is very difficult and
>>> invariably hasn’t worked in the past because nobody has been able to produce
>>> a convincing enough business case for them to do so.  What I would like to
>>> see is our eGov Member Section produce such a  document but that will need a
>>> good deal of input from the membership as it’s beyond the resources of the
>>> Steering Committee.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tgf@lists.oasis-open.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Neil McEvoy
>>> Sent: 30 September 2012 22:30
>>> To: Peter F Brown
>>> Cc: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org; Carol Geyer; laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org
>>> Subject: Re: [tgf] Consulting Engagement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes Peter, the migration to Cloud services, especially for folks like
>>> government, will generate a mass of the consulting work that is bread and
>>> butter for these folks: Business transformation, analysis and audit, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have had a crack at a white paper that introduces the TGF and PACR
>>> work, mapped to local requirements, in this case the Province of Ontario:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://DrummondCloud.info
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I can get lots of Ontario province folks interested, that will attract
>>> the consultants..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Neil.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Peter F Brown <peter@peterfbrown.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed, and with all three of the big 5 you mention being members of
>>> OASIS already, I have tried talking to them to see about engaging further…
>>>
>>> I will be talking with Bill Eggers in Washington in a couple of weeks and
>>> have good contacts with Capgemini too, less so with PwC….
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Neil McEvoy [mailto:neil.mcevoy@ifossfoundation.org]
>>> Sent: Sunday, 30 September, 2012 20:43
>>> To: Peter F Brown
>>> Cc: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org; Carol Geyer; laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org
>>> Subject: Re: [tgf] Consulting Engagement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes Peter I understand the role OASIS should play as a standards body,
>>> distinct from the consultants who would then do the related commercial
>>> engagements. Defining the nature of this relationship would be part of what
>>> to include in this consulting pack that could also be part of their OASIS
>>> membership (IPR agreements etc.).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I`ve also just been discussing this point with Laurent, that I can see
>>> good opportunity to engage with the Cap Geminis, PwCs, Deloittes, ... etc.
>>> with these programs and co-op marketing activities as the incentives for
>>> them to join, so it would be helpful to list the TC assets they would be
>>> entitled to when they join.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are some initial intro slides material for an upcoming webinar that
>>> we could add to, to get the ball rolling..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards, Neil.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Peter F Brown <peter@peterfbrown.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Neil,
>>>
>>> Thanks for raising this important point – and not an easy one to deal
>>> with….
>>>
>>> My quick take would be that this has little to do with the core OASIS
>>> business model: OASIS makes its money from a “pay to play” model for the
>>> development of standards and are certainly keen, through various channels to
>>> see them taken up and used; but OASIS has no role in nurturing specific
>>> SoW’s or contracted work for any party wishing to benefit from the expertize
>>> of a TC member or organization: that is usually down to the members
>>> themselves to shoulder.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That said, I’m copying in OASIS’ business development manager who has
>>> recently talked to the OASIS Board about better ways of promoting the
>>> results of our standards work and getting greater traction and buy through,
>>> for example, specific marketing groups or campaigns.
>>>
>>> The specific sector we are concerned with her e- the public sector in
>>> their “post eGov strategies” has been notoriously difficult for us to
>>> address. We have had several discussions about how to do this and,
>>> certainly, ideas such as white papers, a common slide deck of key issues,
>>> case studies, etc. can all help that.
>>>
>>> Carol – thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tgf@lists.oasis-open.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Neil McEvoy
>>> Sent: Saturday, 29 September, 2012 13:40
>>> To: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org
>>> Subject: [tgf] Consulting Engagement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I`m wondering how governments are enabled to engage with the TGF? I
>>> presume they can join OASIS and then the group, but then what?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This would suggest a consulting engagement - Is this supported and if so
>>> how?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Resources for this could include:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Marketing white paper
>>>
>>> - PPT deck
>>>
>>> - Template documents for SOW engagement
>>>
>>> - Template Competency Framework
>>>
>>> - etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Neil McEvoy
>>> VP Business Development
>>> iFOSSF.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Neil McEvoy
>>> VP Business Development
>>> iFOSSF.org
>>> Skype:neil.mcevoy1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Neil McEvoy
>>> VP Business Development
>>> iFOSSF.org
>>> Skype:neil.mcevoy1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Neil McEvoy
>> VP Business Development
>> iFOSSF.org
>> Skype:neil.mcevoy1
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Neil McEvoy
> VP Business Development
> iFOSSF.org
> Skype:neil.mcevoy1



--

/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393

TC Administration information and support is available at
http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin

Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open



--
Neil McEvoy
VP Business Development
iFOSSF.org
Skype:neil.mcevoy1


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]