Re: [tgf] TGF v2 Review

[Mark Woodward <mark@millbeckconsulting.co.uk>]

Chris and John,

I agree with Chris that this would be best as a separate document, there is much more chance of it being read by the target audience.

I think Chris has taken a sound approach in assembling, and I agree that this will make keeping the document in line with the Framework itself much easier.  As a result the only suggestion I've made in the attached version is to merge and reduce two paragraphs into one, see what you think (it also removes another one of those errant references to cities).  My main question is whether including the conformance criteria is the right thing to do?  As well as nearly doubling the length, it introduces new terms and concepts that haven't been explained.

Regards,

Mark

Mark Woodward

Mill Beck Consulting Limited

Tel: +44 (0) 7788 414553

Email:  mark@millbeckconsulting.co.uk

www.millbeckconsulting.co.uk

Attachment: TGF v2 Executive Summary v0.1_mw.doc
Description: MS-Word document

On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:44, Chris Parker <chris.parker@cstransform.com> wrote:

<TGF v2 Executive Summary v0.1.doc>