OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tgf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [tgf] Re: TGF and the Internet of Things


Jenny

Agree leaving the title until the end would probably make it easier.  Unfortunately to get the CN template from TC Admin they need a title and abbreviation to allocate the filename, URL etc and changing either after that is virtually impossible.

Thanks for continuing to scratch your head over this.  Let's get a few ideas from others and see if there's any common ground.

John

From: Jenny Huang <jenny@ifossfoundation.org>
To: 'TGF TC List' <tgf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, 4 July 2014, 16:25
Subject: Re: [tgf] Re: TGF and the Internet of Things


another thought is   "TGF and IoT Governance"

shorter is indeed the challenge, it needs to be end user friendly so it needs to be somewhat descriptive what it is, at the same time it needs to stay true within its scope and focus. 

other suggestion is to leave the title to the end, it may become easier once the paper is done.  It may be helpful to identify a few key words to help stay focused, here are some that  I observed for the purpose of the CN:
  • TGF pattern
  • IoT governance
  • IoT ecosystem
  • Public sector services
I have my sympathy to Nig & John's comment in other email, agree part of this initial positioning/educational purpose of the CN is also for us to become more clear about the implication & issues to identify future work for TGF.

Regards,
Jenny

On 7/4/2014 1:03 AM, John Borras wrote:


Jenny

Thanks for the suggested title.  Perhaps a bit of a mouthful, something shorter would be better but coming up with that will be a challenge.

John

From: Jenny Huang mailto:jenny@ifossfoundation.org
To: John Borras mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: TGF TC List mailto:tgf@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2014, 18:34
Subject: Re: [tgf] Re: TGF and the Internet of Things

John, 

the structure looks good for me.  How about a title  along the line of     "IoT implication in Public Sector Services"  - a perspective from TGF

Jenny


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:00 AM, John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


From responses received so far there appears to be support for the idea of a new Committee Note.  So to help move this along a little further I've sketched out a proposed structure for the new CN, see attached.  I don't see this  being a lengthy document, maybe 6-10 pages max. 

Perhaps the most difficult part is deciding on a  title for the CN.  Any suggestions on that would be appreciated.

Before I commission the new CN template from TC Admin can I have your views on this structure and any suggestions on other aspects that will need to be included.
 
John

From: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
To: TGF TC List <tgf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Saturday, 28 June 2014, 10:44
Subject: TGF and the Internet of Things

Colleagues
       
Peter, Chris and I had a chat yesterday as a follow-up to our discussions on the last TC call about the possible new Platform Management pattern.  We discussed the suggestion on the TC call that we should be talking more about ecosystem management/governance rather than platform management and referred back to some of Peter's initial TGF Primer thinking on this aspect.

Our conclusions were broadly as follows:
- the IoT does not add anything fundamentally new to the TGF and therefore a new pattern is not required;
- the issues about IoT that need to be addressed in TGF programs relate to the governance aspects of utilising the new range of devices and not the technical issues;
- most if not all of the required governance aspects are already in the TGF but perhaps are not self-evident because they are spread across a number of patterns;
- we should produce a new Committee Note that discusses the relevant aspects of IoT, gives an overview of how to use the TGF in this context and points to the current TGF patterns that support the governance needs;
- the advantages of producing a new Committee Note are that:
     -  it can be done very much quicker than producing a TGF v3.0
     -  it allows us to write a much more discursive piece of text and diagrams, with recommendations rather than being constrained by having to write formal conformance clauses
     - it will not require a lot of new material as much of what needs to be said is already available in the TGF and can be supplemented by extracts from the draft Platform Management pattern and some of the diagrams that have already been put forward
     - we can produce a draft and get it out for Public Review quickly which will test the water and perhaps highlight updates for a future TGF v3.0 

I'm sure Peter and Chris will correct and add to any of the above points which attempt to summarise an hour's call. 

We obviously will need to discuss this on the next TC call before we attempt to put pen to paper on a new Committee Note, but it would be good to get some initial reaction to our recommendation please.

John




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





--
Jenny Huang, Research Director
ICT for Sustainable Development
iFOSSF.org | jenny@ifossfoundation.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]