[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [tm-pubsubj-comment] ISSUE 1 and ISSUE X
Comments on the SAM draft has now raised two issues: psi-identification How does one identify which topics represent published subjects, and which ones do not? psi-set-psi How does one create a topic representing the set of all published subjects defined as part of SAM in such a way that it can be reliably merged? Both of these seem related to ISSUE 1, but ISSUE 1 is phrased in a way that is very unclear, and so it is not clear to me which of these ISSUE 1 actually represents. Either way, it seems that the issues document needs to be extended with one more issue, and that ISSUE 1 needs to be phrased more clearly. Preferably, ISSUE 1 should be stated as a question, with no suggestion of how it might be resolved. It would be useful if this could be resolved this week, so that the Barcelona meeting of WG3 would know what SAM issues correspond to what PubSubj issues. -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC