Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Baltimore minutes

[Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net>]

At 04:43 30.12.2002 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>Section 6, third "point":
>
>   Discussion about title. Is it to be used as a name of the subject
>   set? "Published Subjects for" could be considered a
>   "machine-readable prefix", the actual name being the rest of the
>   title "Languages in ISO 639"
>
>This is not a very good fit to my memory of the discussion. I recall
>the "machine-readable prefix" being proposed, but it was not accepted,
>and personally I find it unspeakably repugnant.

My understanding was that we agreed to regard "Published subjects for
languages in ISO 639" as the full name and "Languages in ISO 639" as
the short name to be used when the context of "PSI sets" was known:

[iso639 : psiset = "Published subjects for languages in ISO 639"
                  = "Languages in ISO 639" /psiset]

Steve

--
Steve Pepper, Chief Executive Officer <pepper@ontopia.net>
Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3  Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps)
Ontopia AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway.
http://www.ontopia.net/ phone: +47-23233080 GSM: +47-90827246