[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Re: TC Website reorganization, and drafts update
* Mary Nishikawa | | For example, if Schlumberger were to implement topic maps, I do not | think that we would go through the trouble and expense to create | specialized xml documents to provide addressable resources for the | same reasons you pointed out. There are generic PSIs that we would | use though. My feeling is that the main cost will be in arriving at a well thought-out set of subjects and text clearly documenting them, and that once that's done the task of typing it in, or converting it from some other format is going to be minor. | I would guess that the most common general use case would be PSI | sets created with one or more SDD documents in html with fragment | identifiers for each subject in the resource. I am not so sure of that. In fact, I was fairly firmly convinced that PSDs would usually be published in XTM form, in order to be maximally useful. Why do you think HTML is to be preferred? | So I think that I agree with you here. I think that another | interesting use case is how subjects in html, xhtml, or xml files | are "annotated" in W3C's Annotea. I wondered how this would fit in | with our recommendations. That is an interesting thought. I am not sure where it goes, though. --Lars M.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC