[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Requirements part1 - towards final draft
* Bernard Vatant | | 1. "published subject documentation" | Since that one will generally document several subjects, should not it be "published | subjects documentation"? Agreed! | 2. "subject definition document" | It comes out from exchanges between Murray and Mary that "document" | could be often a "document node". So this terminology can be | misleading, but I don't see what to propose instead. What is the | generic term for "document or part of document"? Some suggestions: | | "resource" (seems controversial to me) This works. Document does not, nor does element. Also, the resource may perhaps not be a document at all? (An image is not a document.) So I think this is the best. | Murray will suggest maybe that we bring back good ol' PSI there :o) | But we decided that "indicator" is reserved to the TM author | viewpoint, and we are there from the publisher viewpoint. He did, and I think he had a point. I think you should explain more clearly how SDD is different from PSI, and why we need both terms. --Lars M.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC