[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Jan 29 agenda
Some general comments on the agenda. Detailed comments on individual points in separate emails. | 1. Membership status I agree that this should be done by email. | 2. Requirements Part 1 It seems that everyone finds this acceptable as it now is, except for the problem of terminology. I suggest we concentrate on reaching agreement on terminology in the concall and then do a final approval round of the Requirements. This agenda item can therefore be dropped. | 3. Terminology This should be the main discussion issue. | 4. Revision of Charter Again, dependent on terminology. Should not be part of the concall. | 5. Content of deliverable I guess we need to discuss this briefly. | 6. Published subjects documentation format(s): Important to get various people's opinions on the table and briefly discussed. However, this should really be done on the basis of positions that have been established up front in writing. Lars Marius and I will post something on this today. In other words, my suggestion for the agenda is the following: (1) Terminology - aim: reach final agreement (2) Content of deliverable - aim: identify areas that need more work (3) PS documentation format(s) - aim: get everyone's position on the table in preparation for an email discussion. Steve -- Steve Pepper, Chief Executive Officer <pepper@ontopia.net> Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps) Ontopia AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway. http://www.ontopia.net/ phone: +47-23233080 GSM: +47-90827246
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC