RE: [tm-pubsubj] Call for vote on new deliverable structure

["Bandholtz, Thomas" <Thomas.Bandholtz@koeln.sema.slb.com>]

> My vote is "yes" on having two deliverables, but I feel a 
> little uneasy 
> about the titles of the two.
> 
> "Published Subjects : General Requirements and Recommendations"
> "Published Subject Documentation : Requirements and Recommendation"


Very well observed, Mary. I'm ashamed I did not notice that

> 
> These are a little confusing for people outside of our 
> committee, I think.

As well as inside

> 
> Published Subjects Requirements and Recommendations Part I:  General 
> Description and Core Components
> 
> Published Subjects Requirements and Recommendations Part 2: 
> Documentation 
> Structures

Why shouldn't we start with the "PSI primer" (with exactly the content
Bernard has proposed). 

W3C did it for XML Schema Language http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
"XML Schema Part 0: Primer is a non-normative document intended to provide
an easily readable description of the XML Schema facilities, and is oriented
towards quickly understanding how to create schemas using the XML Schema
language." 

... talking about apples & oranges.

Thomas