[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] teleconferences, Committee Plans, etc.
* Mary Nishikawa | | I could handle heading Geolang if it were a subcommittee as opposed | to a full-blown committee. Mary, how do you think this would make it possible for you to handle? I don't think it would be any less work... | In this model we could also expand to other PSI sets (as | subcommittees) when the interest or need arises. We can do that now, too. | It would be good to have an OWL PSI Subcommittee, for example That's not a bad idea, but we could do a separate TC, too. Or we could do a new umbrella TC, but I think we want to finish up the three pieces of work we are currently embarked on before taking up new ones. | (Bernard has already done this work). Uh, no. | As I mentioned, I could probably swing two conference calls/year or | more and maybe even with US 800 numbers for participants. | So I hoped that each of us (with some kind of corporate backing) could | do about 2/year, if it is possible. I will also request reinstatement | of Schlumberger as an OASIS sponsor, but I need to submit a business | case for this. Maybe I can do it for next year. Mary, Patrick and I argued against concalls, but you seem to have ignored that. Could you explain why you prefer concalls? | We need to have more detailed agendas and ToDo lists, I agree with | Patrick there. Then people can sign up for tasks. We are all in agreement on this, it seems, which is good. -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]