[xtm-wg] TMs vs. RDF? (was RE: More Formal Semantics in Topic Maps: OIL, FaCT, RDF ... )

["Scott Tsao" <scott.tsao@boeing.com>]

Alexander Sigel wrote:
> 
> 2. TMs vs. RDF?
> ---------------
> i am not satisfied with the explanations i could find about 
the relationship
> between TMs and RDF (or other schema languages or e.g. Schematron) 
and
> hope we will see some clarification there. if RDF is more general, 
i.e.
> TMs which allow scopes could be implemented in RDF: how would 
implementations
> in other schema languages be different?
> this still leaves the issue of interoperability with people using 
RDF
> to express their ontology brokering approach on the web and should 
not
> be neglected because it hinders the full acceptance of TMs.
> 

I understand that Eric Miller recently gave an excellent presentation 
on "RDF Topicmaps" 
(http://purl.org/net/eric/talks/emiller-w9dd-20000519/) at the WWW9 
conference in Amsterdam.  Would this be an example of implementing
TMs in RDF?

Scott Tsao


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrox Wireless Developer Conference, Amsterdam, July 10-12. Choose from
40+ technical sessions covering application of WAP, XML, ASP, Java and
C++ to mobile computing. Get your ticket to the future today!
http://click.egroups.com/1/5689/3/_/337252/_/961432426/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com