RE: [xtm-wg] Syntax is a bitch :-(

[Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>]

At 09:22 AM 10/9/00, you wrote:
>I agree - but it needs to be as simple as possible; I suggest that we aim to
>enable any processor to establish local uniqueness amongst the resources and
>maps it "sees", rather than trying to be universally-unique from a "god-s
>eye view".

I'm curious as to why it needs to be unique within
the XTM namespace (when it gets one).

Is it used as an XML id value?

Regards DaveP


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Get free updates on your stocks from any phone with Tellme!
Call 1-800-555-TELL.
http://click.egroups.com/1/9535/4/_/337252/_/971111674/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com