RE: W3C status

["Jim Stock" <jss@empolis.co.uk>]

I sent some information before Christmas to Oliver Meier-Gerslerr about W3C
membership (and other membership). He was going to put a proposal to the
board.

REgards,
Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Moore [mailto:gdm@empolis.co.uk]
> Sent: 22 January 2001 10:44
> To: 'H. Holger Rath'
> Cc: 'Jason Markos'; 'Jim Stock'; 'Jens Nebe (E-mail)'; 'Stefan Wess
> (E-mail)'; tit@step.de
> Subject: RE: W3C status
>
>
>
>
> >> Let's go for it! Do we - empolis - have to become a W3C
> >> member to push this forward?
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that if we are not members in some form that we
> should be involved
> so that we are at least privy to what is happening and begin to have a
> presence in this arena. The W3C semantic web - may be
> seriously flawed - but
> like XML and the DOM - there is likely to be a big up-take by
> the industry.
> In my opinion having knowlegde and influencing this development seems
> important.
>
> cheers
>
> graham
>
>
>


________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star Internet, 
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. 
For further information visit:
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp