OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

topicmaps-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM


David Holliday wrote:
> 
> Sorry, our president thinks euros are some sort of cheap car.
> 
> "reification" is both right and proper being correct in nature AND
> fundamental.

And your point is that the *concept* of reification is correct?

We distinctly avoided using the term because it was ambiguously 
defined; ie., that the various communities that use the term all
have varying definitions of it. Being "correct in nature AND
fundamental" is not the issue. Correct in nature and fundamental
in what context? As has been pointed out, reification in XTM and
in RDF are two different ideas. And reification according to Gabel
("False Consciousness: an essay on reification") is yet another.

> I'm glad I've unsubscribed from this group; my prevous mistake was 
> assuming the group was worthwhile.
> 
> Go create your grammer, I've got real big problems to tackle; now.

Well, if you're going to be rude and unprofessional about it, then I
guess we should be glad you're leaving, or going, or already gone. 
(oh, since we're being peevish, might you spell 'grammar' correctly,
and use an adverb rather than an adjective? Swap comma for semicolon?)

For the record (if this were in question), this group is comprised
of some of the most highly-qualified people in the industry, and is 
on track for delivering an XTM specification faster than probably any 
other standards body (compared with ISO, the W3C, IETF, etc.) We've 
gone from a completed ISO 13250 specification to creating a new 
organization and delivering a completely new XTM 1.0 spec in about 
one year. That's lightning fast for a standards group, especially one 
that didn't exist a year ago.

If you don't have the patience to wait around while we finish our work,
that's really your problem, not ours. Go tackle your real big problems.

Murray

...........................................................................
Murray Altheim, SGML/XML Grease Monkey     <mailto:altheim&#64;eng.sun.com>
XML Technology Center
Sun Microsystems, 1601 Willow Rd., MS UMPK17-102, Menlo Park, CA 94025

      In the evening
      The rice leaves in the garden
      Rustle in the autumn wind
      That blows through my reed hut.  -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC