[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xtm-wg] Inappropriate Changes to XTM DTD
In looking over the recent submission to the group from our chairs*, I note that they have unilaterally altered the XTM DTD as according to their own wishes, lacking any consensus from the AG, particularly on the last change, which has anything but consensus. As noted in their DTD: > Version: v1.0.1 > Revision: $Id: xtm1.dtd,v 1.17 2001/01/25 17:17:25 altheim Exp $ > PublicId: "-//TopicMaps.Org//DTD XML Topic Map (XTM) 1.0//EN" > > Revisions: > #2001-01-21: removed baseName from occurrence > #2001-02-02: made variantName optional in variant > #2001-02-02: changed ID to #IMPLIED on association > #2001-02-02: changed ID to #IMPLIED on resourceData > #2001-02-02: changed PLUS to REP on member None of these changes were approved by the AG. Since few in the AG realize this, I may as well as note here that yesterday I privately resigned my post as associate editor, webmaster, graphics designer, and everything else I've been doing for this group (remaining as Participating Member), in protest of what I feel are violations of both letter and spirit. The criticisms that were leveled against the previous editors could easily be made here. I am very unhappy with the current modus operandi, which continues to use expediency as an excuse for misconduct. Up until this time I have edited and maintained the XTM DTD. The current DTD in the submitted "Final Draft" specification (erroneously labeled "1.17", which is the CVS id number of the post-Paris DTD that I edited) does not represent my work, and I object most strenuously to allowing the posting of this new draft, given that the DTD included does not represent the decisions made in Paris, which is represented by the *actual* v1.17, as currently posted on doctypes.org at: http://www.doctypes.org/xtm/1.0/xtm1.dtd Making these changes absent the consensus of the AG is not in the remit of our current chairs. The DTD provided in today's submission is illegitimate. I'm dismayed to see such blatant abuse of power given what I thought would be a heightened sensitivity to these issues following Paris, and especially after the chairs have been the recipient of many days of communication from me on issues of proper attribution and conduct. My resignation letter was 12K in length, to give you an idea of how exhaustively I have tried to express myself on these issues. Not only have the issues I've raised been ignored, we now see alterations to the XTM DTD that represent nothing more than the willful ability to make those changes, the difference between power and authority. I have (perhaps erroneously) handed over the password to the topicmaps.org web site to Steve Pepper and Graham Moore, as I have doubts now that the consensus of the group will be respected. The current submission from the chairs should not be considered the product of this group (for either the submission to the W3C or as a proper posting as a "Final Draft") until it is altered to reflect the consensus of the group as established in Paris. Murray * "February 3rd deliverables", Steve Pepper, Sat, 03 Feb 2001 21:09:49 +0100 ........................................................................... Murray Altheim <mailto:altheim@eng.sun.com> XML Technology Center Sun Microsystems, Inc., MS MPK17-102, 1601 Willow Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025 In the evening The rice leaves in the garden Rustle in the autumn wind That blows through my reed hut. -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups Click here for more details http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/337252/_/981266772/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC