Re: [topicmaps-comment] TMs & XTM [Was: skills to create topic maps]

[Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>]

[murray]
> | In researching use of XTM in a conceptual graph/ontology usage I
> | believe this will be necessary, esp. if an inference engine were to
> | be desired.

[lars]
> This I don't follow. Why would you build an inference engine on top
> of a normalized XTM syntax instead of on top of a topic map engine?
If
> you have a topic map engine you don't need a normalized syntax. And
> doing it on a topic map engine would be an awful lot easier.

I agree. 

S.

=====
<!-- "Saving civilization through markup." -->

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com