[topicmaps-comment] automatic patenting of intellectual property

[psp <beadmaster@ontologystream.com>]

The previous message was developed so that I might talk a bit about mapping
intellectual property.

Axel's (www.nqcg.com) group brings some renewed possibility to the notion
that one might select a domain of inquiry and develop a descriptive
enumeration of the concepts that are being expressed in patents in specific
areas of endeavor.

I have not just a little to say about how such enumeration might occur.

http://www.bcngroup.org/area3/pprueitt/private/KM_files/frame.htm


Perhaps it might be clear, to a few, that the technical-means exists to take
(for example) the native text collection that has been recently gathered
together by the government of China as a representation of the intellectual
property that was up to now collectively owned by the State.  The government
of China seems to wish to create a Patent and Trademark Office.  A PTO in
China would certainly be a positive thing.  But other countries need similar
systems.  So NQCG has this as one of the new business value propositions?

**

Automating IP evaluation and deployment using an architecture based on human
memory, awareness and anticipation

http://www.bcngroup.org/area3/pprueitt/kmbook/Chapter7.htm

is possible.. quickly and by integrating high value linguistic tools.


This was what I suggested, but in the context of FSU IP, to Dan Quayle in
1992 in the proposal I and Professor Ed Finn made from Georgetown University
(via the office of E. Roy Chalk), and which was briefly discussed at the
highest levels of both the Russian government and the US government.

Then again the issue was raised in an invited presentation (at GU) I made to
university IP lawyers in 1993.  Here the concept was that representation of
the (1) intellectual property in a specific area of endeavor and (2) the
market needs in a market space; might be associated using a simple neural
network.

Then there was the development of the BCNGroup Charter and its publication
in 1997.

http://www.bcngroup.org/admin/Charter.html

Then there was the work and discussion that I have had with the creators of
Dr. Link at Manning and Naplier Information Service (in conjunction with
work that Liz Liddy has done on the representation of concepts (in text) and
concept affordance as Peircean graphs.)

Then there are the decade long discussions that I have on-going with 5 or 6
"machine linguists", who have developed variations on Latent Semantic
Indexing and the application of other stochastic type processes to the
mapping of meaning in text.

Then there was the publishing of the important book: "Technological
Innovation as an Evolutionary Process", edited by John Ziman 2000, Cambridge
university Press.


And then more recent introduction to the goals of M-CAM, (www.m-cam.com) .

Then there has been the development of the SLIP Browsers and the
foundational work on eventChemistry (work that is just now beginning, on a
world wide scale).

So, I am NOW ready to develop a tri-level informational system that acquires
language independent (?) IP citations from Natural Language Parsing.   Of
course, the notion of the many-to-one and one-to-many communication manager

http://www.ontologystream.com/distanceLearning/learningSystem.htm

could control the presentation over television and the Internet of the
results from IP evaluation and adoption processes, as mediated and
facilitated by the BCNGroup and NQCG.

see:

http://www.ontologystream.com/OS/Capability.htm

****

Ok, so the major point I want to make.....

There are short term and long term objectives that can be established.  The
short term does not need a quantum computer, but rather a tri-level software
system running on a von Neumann computer. This has been now accomplished by
Don Mitchell's simple programs where by some elements of Inmentia's concept
of tensor type information systems is combined with SLIP and eventChemistry
to produce a new computing, and knowledge representational framework based
on In-memory structural holonomy (not reducible to Codd and Date's notions
on data bases).

Moving to optic computing is a step towards making the tri-level very fast,
but does not yet move the physics out of what we as ultra-quantum existences
can control.  The notions of quantum information channels, and how the brain
clearly uses the quantum level dynamics to see, is well developed in the
literature by Pribram and in his many conferences at Radford and Georgetown.


The issues of environmental decoherence can go away if the ground level is
seen as the elements of a deconstruction of memes.

Then the scope of the project can be made only on the Nordic communities
production of IP and the controlled (for the common good) packaging and
presentations of these common results into the multi-media framework that
NQCG has worked out.

**

So there is not reason why we can not start today, and have an operational
knowledge base and presentation stream within 6 months, now is there?

**

What we need is capital to move in this direction.