[topicmaps-comment] cyber defense system

[psp <beadmaster@ontologystream.com>]

Karl Pribram, see note below, correctly sees that "computer intrusion
detection" and innovation adoption are the same type of general systems
process.

We are looking for a process model for both that comes from (is directly
refenced into the cogntive neuroscience literature, particularly Pribram's
1991 book and the six International conferences on quantum neurodynamics.)

The difference that Karl notes difference between Einsteinian time and
Bergsonian "Dure" can be (is) accounted for by the Process Compartment
Hypothesis (as developed in 1995 by myself)

http://www.bcngroup.org/area3/pprueitt/kmbook/Chapter1.htm

comments?

The PCH is a theory of "event formation".  The SLIP and eventChemistry work
is a stratified theory **implemented as software**

http://www.ontologystream.com/SLIP/index1.htm

Again, comments to ->bcngroup@erols.com



-----Original Message-----
From: pribramk@georgetown.edu [mailto:pribramk@georgetown.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:27 PM
To: psp
Subject: Re: FW: national cyber warfare defense system


Paul:  Look at Lecture 10 in Brain and Perception for the difference between
Einsteinian time and Bergsonian "Dure".

  Your intrusion of innovation would fit this theme if innovation were
inserted into a durable plan.  But more often I believe innovation results
from taking a careful inventory of what exists and then bring in novelty by
rearranging the existing.  Of course innovation is but one form of
creativity. Experiencing in a multidimensional abstract space is another.
The intrusions come in when the particular issue intrudes unexpectedly into
awareness:  the decisive moment (again Lectuer 10 B&P).   Katherine and I
are looking into our schedule for that decisive moment when you'll be in
Warrenton.  Karl