[topicmaps-comment] Re: [topicmapmail] RE: W3C XML Schema for XTM DTD(Needed for UDDI efforts?)

[Max Voskob <mvoskob@msi.com.au>]

Sorry, guys, I didn't mean to start a discussion that would span several
TCs.
I mean the UDDI TC is not into adoption of XTM at the moment. It was just a
suggestion that I was asked to investigate.

I'll be in touch
Max


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel Biezunski" <mb@coolheads.com>
To: "Daniel L. Koger" <daniel@kogers.com>; "Mary Nishikawa"
<nisikawa@fuchinobe.oilfield.slb.com>; "Max Voskob" <mvoskob@msi.net.nz>;
<topicmaps-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>;
<uddi-spec-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc: <topicmapmail@infoloom.com>; "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [topicmapmail] RE: W3C XML Schema for XTM DTD (Needed for UDDI
efforts?)


> Daniel Koger:
>
> > I know we discussed the rationale for using DTD at the inception of the
> > XTM Working Group.  I just don't remember what that rationale was...
> > Must be because I sit on the cusp of my 40th birthday - the memory is
> > fading. :)
>
> The XML Schema recommendation was not finalized at the time we finished
> the spec. We didn't want to wait until it would be done to publish.
>
> Michel
> ===================================
> Michel Biezunski
> Coolheads Consulting
> 402 85th Street #5C
> Brooklyn, New York 11209
> Email:mb@coolheads.com
> Web  :http://www.coolheads.com
> Voice: (718) 921-0901
> ==================================
>
>