RE: TOSCA feedback

["Behrens, Michael V CTR (US)" <michael.v.behrens.ctr@mail.mil>]

Thanks Paul.
I would add that on #2 below, that if incorporated, the digest algorithm should also be required.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lipton, Paul C [mailto:Paul.Lipton@ca.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 11:17 PM
To: Behrens, Michael V CTR (US); tosca-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: TOSCA feedback

Hi Michael,

Thank you for your comments. I acknowledge receipt of the below as TOSCA TC Co-Chair. Please be assured that the TC will carefully consider your comments. 

Thanks again,
Paul 


-----Original Message-----
From: tosca-comment@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca-comment@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Behrens, Michael V CTR (US)
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 6:04 PM
To: tosca-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [tosca-comment] TOSCA feedback

Just a couple of quick comments:

1) I’d recommend that the metadata folder in the archive not be prefixed by the specification name. It should simple be "Metadata", either that or follow the Java and other archive examples: "META-INF".

2) I recommend that a digest value be standardized to allow the archive's integrity to be verified.  We used this effectively in the OGF Application Content Services (ACS) specification:  http://www.gridforum.org/documents/GFD.73.pdf


Michael Behrens 
DISA GCCS-J I3, A3K55H   
☎ 301-225-5076, cell: 571-594-3008
∴R2AD Email: Michael.Behrens@R2AD.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature