[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Restricting relationship types to node types and node types with capability types.
At present relationship type definitions may contain a restriction to limit their application to node types which contain one or more of the specified capability types. Currently the name of this keyword is valid_target_types which is somewhat
inaccurate and could be confusing. Furthermore I have a pattern for node extension which would benefit from an additional limitation on relationship types so that they were only applicable to specified node types. Therefore I propose that relationship type definition is amended as follows:
If both valid_target_node_types and valid_target_node_capabilities are specified then they would be ANDed, i.e. the relationship type would be applicable only to a nodes of the specified type if it had one or more of the specified capabilities.
Paul Jordan This email contains information from BT that might be privileged
or confidential. And it's only meant for the person above. If that's not you, we're sorry - we must have sent it to you by mistake. Please email us to let us know, and don't copy or forward it to anyone else. Thanks. We monitor our email systems and may record all our emails. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]