Re: [tosca-interop] Uploaded initial sample ServiceTemplate for SugarCRM

[Tobias Kunze <tkunze@redhat.com>]

Thomas-

Thanks a lot for creating this, including the PPT. One thing I notice is that the Capability/Requirement type attribute (if I understand it correctly) won't be enough to actually identify a node type. We ran into this with OpenShift. For instance, the topology could have two Apaches, both providing a "ns1:WebAppContainerCapability" type Capability, let's say one for a PHP app workload, the other to run a static web server. It is important for the application workload node type to specify a specific requirement on the Apache hosting mod_php.

I can't tell off-hand whether our current Capability/Requirement definition allows for that kind of addressing (wd11 seems to suggest it doesn't).

-Tobias


On Sep 14, 2012, at 2:56, Mr. Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I just uploaded an initial sample TOSCA ServiceTemplate for the SugarCRM use case according to wd-11 as input for the interop SC.
> 
> The Cloud Service Archive (CSAR) can be found at this location:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/46915/SugarCRM-20120914.zip
> 
> There is also a small chart deck that depicts some of the structure of the ServiceTemplate to help understand the XML files:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/46916/SugarCRM-20120914.pptx
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas