Matt, could you please add the modified version below (no joke) of my response to the last posting in the chat:
[12:07] Paul Lipton (Co-Chair) Private: Can you likely implement
an InTEROPERABLE version of a TOSCA consuming or creating thing without reading this doc? I doubt it unless you are lucky.
[12:08] Paul Lipton (Co-Chair) Private: Dont' think like an
implementer, think like a lawyer. 
Yes, this stuff is mundane, but Apple got a patent for page turns!
[12:10] Paul Lipton (Co-Chair) Private: So, we are going to
increase potential LEGAL RISK to improve readability a little (2 docs for one version is not the end of the world). Not a good tradeoff in practical terms.
[12:12] Paul Lipton (Co-Chair) Private: We could keep it a
WD until we start v.next and then do the merge as needed with v.next's spec. That would work for me, too.
[12:13] Paul Lipton (Co-Chair) Private: It won't stop ANYBODY
from doing interops or implementations.
Thanks,
Paul
From: tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Matthew Rutkowski
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:13 PM
To: tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [tosca-interop] Groups - TOSCA Interop SC Minutes for 2013-01-14.htm uploaded
|
Document Name:
TOSCA Interop SC Minutes for 2013-01-14.htm
No description provided.
Submitter: Mr. Matthew Rutkowski |