[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca] spec errata
Based on my understanding of the OASIS process, this is one possible approach.
Thanks, Paul
From: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Doug Davis On today's call we talked briefly about erratas and minor editorial changes. If I understand our current state, we today voted to push wd16 out the door and to start the process of making it
our proposed oasis v1.0 spec. It seems to me that we can deal with these minor edits if we simply follow the oasis process. Meaning, the TC decides at some point to roll-up a group of edits into a WD, then we start the process of it being a CS and then OASIS
Spec (calling it v1.0.1). Since that process will take a bit of time, it will finish after v1.0 is published. We can then iterate on this process as many times as we'd like to pick-up additional edits that I'm sure people will find as they read/implement
the spec. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]