OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tosca message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (TOSCA-87) Use Case: Specifying additional constraints / preferences when selecting target resources (Nodes) (e.g. prefer a specific Firewall)


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TOSCA-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33597#action_33597 ] 

Aaron Zhang commented on TOSCA-87:
----------------------------------

@Frank: Sounds reasonable, no doubt that Policies in NodeTemplate can be used to resolve this issue.

The question becomes whether we need to define a set of standard Policies, I think.

> Use Case: Specifying additional constraints / preferences when selecting target resources (Nodes) (e.g. prefer a specific Firewall)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOSCA-87
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TOSCA-87
>             Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Interop
>         Environment: Use case for development against TOSCA-v1.0-cs01.
>            Reporter: Matthew Rutkowski 
>            Assignee: Aaron Zhang
>
> How does a service template designer provide additional "constraints" to the provider deploying the template in order to convey preference of certain node types (or resources) over another.
> Example:
> A service template declares its need for a Firewall node, but prefers type AAA over type XXX due to reliability.
> Notes:
> Aaron: High Level Suggestion: Extend TOSCA NodeTemplate/NodeType to support specifying additional conditions for target VM resources. 
> Options: 
> a) Let the deployer specify/recommends the firewall(s) he trusts
> b) Let the deployer specify the firewall(s) he doesn't trust.
> Matt: Perhaps an alternative use case using  an artifact type to allow desire for matching to a specific Java runtime (provider, version) over another.  Could these be constraints expressed as Reg. Exp. against node or artifact properties?
> Reference:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca-interop/download.php/48504/New%20Scenarios%20for%20TOSCA%20from%20Huawei.pptx

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]