[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (TOSCA-150) WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms)
WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: TOSCA-150 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TOSCA-150 Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC Issue Type: Improvement Components: Profile-YAML Affects Versions: CSD1 Reporter: Matthew Rutkowski Assignee: Matthew Rutkowski Fix For: CSD1 Here is what we have now: # Requirement for a specific named entity (e.g., a Node Type or Node Template) - <requirement_name>: <entity_name> # Requirement clause for a specific named Capability Type - <requirement_name>: <capability_type_name> # Requirement for a node type with an optional, explicit Relationship type - <requirement_name>: <node_type_name> relationship_type: <relationship_name> Thomas, Derek and Matt believe we can collapse into single grammar. Also, we need to expand the definitions to show constraints. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]