[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-137) WD02 - Need to address "optional" and "best can" on node requirements (constraints) for matching/resolution
[ https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TOSCA-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Lipton updated TOSCA-137: ------------------------------- Summary: WD02 - Need to address "optional" and "best can" on node requirements (constraints) for matching/resolution (was: WD01 - Need to address "optional" and "best can" on node requirements (constraints) for matching/resolution ) > WD02 - Need to address "optional" and "best can" on node requirements (constraints) for matching/resolution > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TOSCA-137 > URL: https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TOSCA-137 > Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Profile-YAML > Affects Versions: CSD2 > Reporter: Matthew Rutkowski > Assignee: Matthew Rutkowski > Fix For: CSD2 > > > In order to allow for flexibility when orchestrator "match" one node's requirements to another node's capabilities/features (fulfillment) we need to allow for a syntax/grammar that allows each requirement to be labeled "optional" or "best can" ("best match"). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.1#6155)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]