[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04.docx uploaded
Hi Jacques, to add my 2 cents: Option A will not make it, i.e. we do not plan to rely on a "by convention name matching" mechanism. IMO, the meaning of requirements must lie in the metadata like what kind of thing is referred to and/or what kind of relationship is used. We listed it in the current draft more as kind of a counter-example to explicitly tell people this it _not_ how it works. I think Option B and C will make it. Option C is actually the most specific one, i.e. with most information, but you only need to define as much detail if needed. That is, the additional specification is optional. That said, we can still have a very short notation as shown in Option A, i.e. only one line, but not implying magic name matching. The only implication of such a one line notation would be: if the orchestrator cannot derive the type of relationship to use, it will just assume a generic "DependsOn" link. Regards, Thomas From: Matt Rutkowski <mrutkows@us.ibm.com> To: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org, Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> Date: 08/05/2014 15:56 Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04.docx uploaded Sent by: <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org> Thanks Jacques, We can review your comments at our next opportunity; however, I believe that we are going to allow all 3 options to be viable (depending on context) and will have to make that clearer in the next set of revisions. Although Option A, IMO still leaves room for some ambiguity which we should discuss further, it does allow for simpler notation for hosting relationships. For our normative types, I believe I would very much like to use Option B to be completely clear that relationships are HostedOn, etc. and would go a long way to readers of the spec. and implementers as well. We have already run into an implementer case where it was hard for them to see the exact use case where WebApp was hosted on WebServer by the implied use of the name "host" for the requirement. Kind regards, Matt From: Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> To: Matt Rutkowski/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "tosca@lists.oasis-open.org" <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: 05/08/2014 12:25 AM Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04.docx uploaded Not sure if there is a TOSCA issue associated with that draft, so sending back a few comments inline on the 3 options under D.1.1 (I prefer Option C…) in new Appendix D as response to this email (the attached draft is small enough). Thanks, -jacques From: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Rutkowski Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:59 AM To: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04.docx uploaded |----------------------------------------------------------------| | Document Name: TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04.docx | | | | | | | | | | | | No description provided. | | Download Latest Revision | | Public Download Link | | | | | | | | Submitter: Mr. Matthew Rutkowski | | Group: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud| | Applications (TOSCA) TC | | Folder: Working Documents | | Date submitted: 2014-05-01 11:58:21 | |----------------------------------------------------------------| [attachment "TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-wd02-Rev-04-JD.docx" deleted by Matt Rutkowski/Austin/IBM]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]