OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tosca message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-124) Errata - Reference Corrections


    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=42843#comment-42843 ] 

Paul Lipton  commented on TOSCA-124:
------------------------------------

See CSD 02 candidate for errata (spelling and reformat of zip to include schema. Otherwise, the same as CSD01: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/53678/TOSCA-v1.0-errata01-csd02.zip

> Errata - Reference Corrections
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOSCA-124
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-124
>             Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Errata
>    Affects Versions: OASIS Standard v1.0
>            Reporter: Paul Lipton 
>            Assignee: Thomas Spatzier 
>             Fix For: OASIS Standard v1.0
>
>
> The TC on 5 Sept 2013, in response to public comment #1-8, passed a motion that stated: "Treat the comments related to "document references", currently number 1-8 in spreadsheet, in the same fashion, which is: a.) classify them as non-material changes, b.) address them as part of an Errata to the v1.0 Spec and c.) instruct the co-editors to fix the references. Furthermore, the TC empowers the co-chairs to construct a formal response for review in the next meeting." 
> The latest revision of that public response document (for COS) can be found at:  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/50551/latest/TOSCA Spec v1 COS - TC Responses to Public Review Comments.xlsx 
> I am taking the liberty of assigning one of the co-editors to this so that we don't lose sight of this consideration during future errata editorial work. The editors may choose (and are encouraged) to consider this further and make recommendations. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]