[OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-150) CLOSE - WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms)

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Matthew Rutkowski  updated TOSCA-150:
-------------------------------------

    Summary: CLOSE - WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms)  (was: WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms))

> CLOSE - WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOSCA-150
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-150
>             Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Profile-YAML
>    Affects Versions: CSD2
>            Reporter: Matthew Rutkowski 
>            Assignee: Matthew Rutkowski 
>             Fix For: CSD2
>
>
> Here is what we have now:
> # Requirement for a specific named entity (e.g., a Node Type or Node Template)
> - <requirement_name>: <entity_name>
> # Requirement clause for a specific named Capability Type
> - <requirement_name>: <capability_type_name>
> # Requirement for a node type with an optional, explicit Relationship type 
> - <requirement_name>: <node_type_name>
>   relationship_type: <relationship_name>
> Thomas, Derek and Matt believe we can collapse into single grammar.
> Also, we need to expand the definitions to show constraints.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)