Thanks Sahdev, I’ll start with an email, since a number of the issues will likely need some discussion. Based on the discussion, I can upload edited YAML files.
I’ll work on this later today and tomorrow.
Thanks,
Chris
From: Sahdev P Zala [mailto:spzala@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 4:15 PM
To: Chris Lauwers
Cc: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - 2015-04-13 tosca_elk_DRAFT_CSAR.zip uploaded
Hi Chris,
Thank you so much for the review. I am looking forward to have your comments.
I think email probably is a good way or may be you can upload them as a doc at the same place we have CSAR? I will make changes per your comments unless I have questions or need to have a discussion.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Sahdev Zala
From: Chris Lauwers <lauwers@ubicity.com>
To: Sahdev P Zala/Durham/IBM@IBMUS, "tosca@lists.oasis-open.org"
<tosca@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 04/13/2015 04:57 PM
Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - 2015-04-13 tosca_elk_DRAFT_CSAR.zip uploaded
Sent by: <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org>
Hi Sahdev,
Thanks for the update. I finally managed to run this test case through my validator, and it turns out there are many issues with the YAML files in this package. In particular, many
of the “requirements” sections (in Node Templates as well as in Node Types) do not conform to the spec.
What is the best way for me to submit my comments so we can get this package updated?
Best regards,
Chris
From:
tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Sahdev Zala
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:10 AM
To: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [tosca] Groups - 2015-04-13 tosca_elk_DRAFT_CSAR.zip uploaded
Submitter's message
Document for InterOp. SC review.
Thanks to Matt and Christopher Kaufmann for their initial comments, update the draft with some minor changes. Thanks!
-- Sahdev Zala