[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-276) F.5.2 tosca.nodes.network.Port is a NIC and we call it Port
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60668#comment-60668 ] Luca Gioppo commented on TOSCA-276: ----------------------------------- I'm sorry !! I've had a talk with a friend of mine that is a network sysadmin and I finally understood the problem. I'm more on the application side so I reason more at a level 4 of OSI and for me port is the TCP port. I see now that the node name comes from the most commonly used term in the Level 2/1 OSI that is the "port of a switch or the port of the NIC". We live in the IT world where overload of terms is usual but many times is confined to a scoped environment where people talk all the same slang so network people understand each other; unfortunately this standard goes from very low level things to application stuff, collecting all the overloads we have. Said that now I have a more clear idea and stated that I'm not a network guy, my question is: Since the standard needs to talk to a set of subjects that could have the same confusion, is there a way to avoid the ambiguous overload (not only on this subject, but even if potential future issues)? My concern is the "usability of the standard": who is the subject that we think will be writing a TOSCA file? At the moment highly skilled people with multi competency in design the deployment of a complex system. How we plan to ease this job? The risk is that no one will want to use it (talk form a customer perspective) > F.5.2 tosca.nodes.network.Port is a NIC and we call it Port > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TOSCA-276 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-276 > Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Profile-YAML > Reporter: Luca Gioppo > > As stated in the documentation the F.5.2 tosca.nodes.network.Port is a NIC but we call it Port that is something very different. > Proposal is to change the name of this node to NIC and not Port to help also better understanding. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]