[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - NFV&SDN adhoc agenda on 8.3.docx uploaded
IMHO, +1 to John’s suggestion in terms of any planning for the same of TC consumers like ETSI NFV. TC consumers care about TC deliverables that have
standing, which are CSDs and higher status work products, not working drafts (WDs), which have no standing. Also, in my experience, it is difficult to predict how many WDs are actually needed before a CSD milestone is ready.
Thanks, Paul
From: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of John Crandall Shitao, Suggestion… In the discussion column instead of stating “will be solved in tosca-nfv-v1.0-wd03-rev01”. Either say “Targeted for csd04” or “Fixed in csd04”.
If we identify it as fixed in a version, this directs me as the editor to make sure the change is in. Thoughts? John From:
tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of shitao li
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]