OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tosca message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-315) A Few Editorial Comments/Suggestions Received (against v1.1 CS01 Final)


     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Paul Lipton updated TOSCA-315:
------------------------------

    Description: 
From the commenter (Mike Gerdts) received via TOSCA TC comment email portal based on TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final (comments removed).docx (https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/58781/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final%20(comments%20removed).docx): 

Line 3: Specification misspelled

Section 11.1.15.3: the wordpress node_template calls "get_input: 
context_root".  context_root is not a defined input.

Section 11.1.7.3: Parts of the yaml use the Normal style where they should use Code Snippit.  This happens in the description and "topology_template:".

I'm not sure how standard the yellow highlight in the "code snippit" 
areas is across OASIS documents.  A long while back I did the same thing and found that when printed on a black and white printer that the yellow highlight was not distinguishable from the gray background.  I solved this by adding a style that did the yellow shading (nice for pdf
viewing) and a wavy underline (distinguishable in b&w print).  I don't feel strongly that the document should be changed in this way, just sharing experience in case this improves the usability for tree killers.


  was:
From the commenter (Mike Gerdt) based on TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final (comments removed).docx (https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/58781/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final%20(comments%20removed).docx): 

Line 3: Specification misspelled

Section 11.1.15.3: the wordpress node_template calls "get_input: 
context_root".  context_root is not a defined input.

Section 11.1.7.3: Parts of the yaml use the Normal style where they should use Code Snippit.  This happens in the description and "topology_template:".

I'm not sure how standard the yellow highlight in the "code snippit" 
areas is across OASIS documents.  A long while back I did the same thing and found that when printed on a black and white printer that the yellow highlight was not distinguishable from the gray background.  I solved this by adding a style that did the yellow shading (nice for pdf
viewing) and a wavy underline (distinguishable in b&w print).  I don't feel strongly that the document should be changed in this way, just sharing experience in case this improves the usability for tree killers.



> A Few Editorial Comments/Suggestions Received (against v1.1 CS01 Final)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOSCA-315
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-315
>             Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Paul Lipton
>            Priority: Minor
>
> From the commenter (Mike Gerdts) received via TOSCA TC comment email portal based on TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final (comments removed).docx (https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/58781/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1-csd01-final%20(comments%20removed).docx): 
> Line 3: Specification misspelled
> Section 11.1.15.3: the wordpress node_template calls "get_input: 
> context_root".  context_root is not a defined input.
> Section 11.1.7.3: Parts of the yaml use the Normal style where they should use Code Snippit.  This happens in the description and "topology_template:".
> I'm not sure how standard the yellow highlight in the "code snippit" 
> areas is across OASIS documents.  A long while back I did the same thing and found that when printed on a black and white printer that the yellow highlight was not distinguishable from the gray background.  I solved this by adding a style that did the yellow shading (nice for pdf
> viewing) and a wavy underline (distinguishable in b&w print).  I don't feel strongly that the document should be changed in this way, just sharing experience in case this improves the usability for tree killers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]