[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tosca] Groups - Issue_TOSCAXXX_Substitution_mappings_grammar_support.docx uploaded
Hi Thinh, Matt, I unfortunately was not here on Tuesday and I don’t really understand what this proposal is trying to achieve, it sounds like it is not substitution anymore but
a new way to define a node type. How are the interfaces of the substitution playing vs workflows and how with the nodes within the topology? I’m not sure to understand what scenario this proposal is solving that classical TOSCA cannot solve. Is there a detailed use-case? Why not having a node template
in the topology that defines the interface and actual capability to be exposed? Is this going to be discussed again in next Tuesday call ? Luc From:
<tosca@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Thinh Nguyenphu <thinh.nguyenphu@nokia.com> Submitter's message
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]