[OASIS Issue Tracker] (TOSCA-323) Comments on CSD04 from ETSI NFV (response to NFV(17)000178_LS)

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

shitao li updated TOSCA-323:
----------------------------

    Assignee: shitao li

> Comments on CSD04 from ETSI NFV (response to NFV(17)000178_LS)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOSCA-323
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TOSCA-323
>             Project: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Profile-NFV
>    Affects Versions: NFV_V1.0_CSD04
>            Reporter: shitao li
>            Assignee: shitao li
>
> C#1 and C#2 (3.1 ,3.2): volunteer by Thinh
> C#3 (5.4.1) FFS 
> C#4 (5.3.5): volunteer by Thinh
> C#5 (5.3.6.1): volunteer by Alex 
> Alex: When do we want to switch to the latest IFA011?
> The group agreed that the next CSD05 should align to the latest IFA011.
> C#6, confirmation to SOL is needed : volunteer by Shitao 
> Question in Annex 2:
> Question 1: 
> Alex: VDU design re-consideration is needed, what does VDU mean from ETSI NFV perspective? ONAP has different understanding
> Action item by Alex, Michael
> Question 2: 
> volunteer by Shitao 
> Question 3: 
> This should be solved with a general solution by simple yaml group , a new JIRA issue is needed.
> Question 4: 
> volunteer by Alex, the right version might be osca_simple_profile_for_nfv_1.0
> Question 5: 
> volunteer by shitao
> Question 6:
> Deployment flavor is working on progress.
> Question 7:
> It is more appropriate to be clarified from ETSI NFV side. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)