[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca] Datatype definition with an empty base type?
Hi Thinh, No one doubted that it is possible to define an empty base data type and derive other data types from it. The point is that in the interface type definition in SOL001 we will have properties of this empty data type. But any interface defined in any SOL001 compliant VNFD service template will have those properties not from
the base empty type but from the derived type. Is there a way to express that in the schema? Otherwise how can we preclude that in a VNFD service template, any property is replaced by a property of a derived, richer type? BR, Arturo From: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Chris Lauwers Yes, I don’t see any issues with this. Chris Sent from my iPhone
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]