[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca] Groups - Example of Imperative Workflows supporting custom workflow language uploaded
Hi Priya and all I think the issue you want to solve is related to this example in clause 6.7.1.5 of SOL001, that the script_input_1 and script_input_2 are used as
the input parameters to the instantiate-script in the implementation. topology_template: substitution_mappings: node_type: MyCompany.SunshineDB.1_0.1_0 .. node_templates: SunshineDB: type: MyCompany.SunshineDB.1_0.1_0 .. interfaces: Vnflcm: instantiate: implementation: instantiate-script inputs: script_input_1: value_1 script_input_2: value_2 artifacts: instantiate-script: description: Instantiate workflow script type: tosca.artifacts.Implementation.Python file: instantiate.py #repository: .. #deploy_path: .. .. So my question is that is the above example correct from TOSCA grammar perspective, if it is correct, can we follow the similar way to describe the
input for the implementation in a workflow? Regards shitao 发件人: tosca@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca@lists.oasis-open.org]
代表
Priya TG
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]