Re: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA Architectures and Language impact uploaded

Hi Peter,

Very good additive representation. With respect to the TOSCA work, I always assumed that both the âTOSCA model catalogueâ and âInstance model inventoryâ are expected for a comprehensive solution.

Regarding the âinstance exportâ this is a good proposal, as it will:

Spell out the instance model representation
Make it easier to save/load/exchange/log instance models

One thing I have not thought of is the direct âtopology changeâ. We need to understand if this is needed or all the topology changes happen only via input / runtime operation changes.

BR/Calin

From: <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Peter Bruun <pmb@hpe.com>
Date: Monday, 16 November 2020 at 11:48
To: "tosca@lists.oasis-open.org" <tosca@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [tosca] Groups - TOSCA Architectures and Language impact uploaded

Submitter's message
For discussion, I have started from Chris' minimal architecture and elaborated on more complex architectures and hinted what they may mean for the TOSCA language design.
The intention is to disambiguate and clarify why some of us think that some proposed language features are redundant and others believe them to be critical.
-- Dr. Peter Bruun

Document Name: TOSCA Architectures and Language impact

Description
For discussion, I have started from Chris' minimal architecture and
elaborated on more complex architectures and hinted what they may mean for
the TOSCA language design.
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link

Submitter: Dr. Peter Bruun
Group: OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
Folder: Working Documents
Date submitted: 2020-11-16 02:46:07

tosca message