[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: operation implementations
When defining operation implementations, TOSCA v1.3 makes a distinction between “primary” and “dependent” artifacts. I’m not sure this distinction is useful. I propose that instead, we change operation implementations in v2.0 to take a
list of artifacts, where each artifact in the list is processed sequentially. Comments? Thanks, Chris |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]