Editorial comments resulting from latest draft edits

[Paul Jordan <paul.m.jordan@outlook.com>]

In the Language Ad-Hoc Feb 15th we saw some edits Calin has made. These 
change some occurrences of the keyword integer used in the Type column; 
these changes are intended to better convey the allowable range of the 
integer. e.g. 'non-negative integer' and positive integer'.

I have no objection to these but if they are used here the terms should 
be applied everywhere where integer is used in the Type column. That is, 
in all places where occurrences is defined and also in 4.3.6.8.1 for 
Timeout and 4.6.5.2 for Evaluations. The latter two would, for example, 
become 'positive integer'.

To be even more precise why not define special types which derive from 
the primitive type of integer but which have constraints to enforce 
'non-negative integer' and 'positive integer'? Then use those the names 
of those special types in the table entries mentioned above.

Regards

Paul Jordan