[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: XML namespace for OASIS TransWS group
Attached is a mail from Karl Best at OASIS re the namespace of the various
documents (WSDL & XSD) that we'll be producing as part of the spec.
If anybody has any comments on the namespaces that I've recommended, let me
know.
Steve
---------------------------------------------
Stephen Flinter
Connect Global Solutions
[t] +353 (0)1 882 9038
[f] +353 (0)1 882 9050
[m] +353 87 798 1228
[e] stephen.flinter@connectcgs.com
[w] www.connectcgs.com
--------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Stephen Flinter/Connect on 03/03/2004 16:31 -----
"Karl F. Best"
<karl.best@oasis- To: Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com
open.org> cc: webmaster@oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: XML namespace for OASIS TransWS group
03/03/2004 14:56
Please respond to
karl.best
Stephen:
What you suggest appears to comply with RFC3121 (see
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3121.txt) which is our registered URN
namespace. You'll note that we have no mechanism for resolving the
namespace, and we've left it up to the TC to keep names within their
branch of the namespace unique. So I think that you're fine to go with
what you suggested.
-Karl
Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com wrote:
>
> Karl,
>
> I'm the acting editor of the OASIS TransWS TC. At present, I'm in the
> process of defining the WSDL and the XML Schemas that will be used by our
> specification. I'm guessing that you're the person I need to deal with.
> If you're not, I would appreciate it if you could let me know to whom I
> should be talking.
>
> Anyway, as part of the spec we will have two WSDL files, and probably
five
> XML schemas. I propose that we use the following namespaces for the
> various files:
>
> WSTransBind.wsdl (WSDL binding): urn:oasis:names:tc:wstrans:v1:bind
> WSTransIntf:wsdl (WSDL interface) urn:oasis:names:tc:wstrans:v1:intf
> WSTransTypes.xsd (XML Schema types) urn:oasis:names:tc:wstrans:v1:types
>
> The remaining XML Schema documents have not yet been finalised, but I
would
> propose that we continue with the naming convention
> urn:oasis:names:tc:wstrans:v1:XXX. These namespaces comply with other
> recent OASIS specs I have seen, as well as with RFC3121.
>
> Do you have any objections to the proposed namespace, or any suggestions
or
> amendments that we should consider?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Stephen Flinter
> Connect Global Solutions
> [t] +353 (0)1 882 9038
> [f] +353 (0)1 882 9050
> [m] +353 87 798 1228
> [e] stephen.flinter@connectcgs.com
> [w] www.connectcgs.com
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
--
=================================================================
Karl F. Best
Vice President, OASIS
office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648
karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]